Agency Comparison
Method vs Supercharge
Two Healthcare UX specialists — London vs Budapest.
Side by side
Key data on both agencies. The accent dot marks where one leads.
| Method | Supercharge | |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 77/100 | 77/100 |
| Hourly rate | €117/hr | ●€70-100/hr |
| Team size | 50-99 | ●100-249 |
| Location | London, United Kingdom | Budapest, Hungary |
| Founded | — | — |
| Tier | Free | Free |
| Last reviewed | ●Feb 11, 2026 | Feb 2, 2026 |
What we said about each
What we said about Method
"Method is a strategic design and product development consultancy, part of GlobalLogic (Hitachi), with 25 years of operation. The Jenius Bank case study documents end-to-end engagement from discovery through engineering—including experience benchmarking, prototyping, concept testing, and building a research culture, repository, and knowledge base for the client's product team. Published work spans financial services, consumer brands (Ben & Jerry's, McDonald's), and industrial sectors."
— UXAgencies editorial team, reviewed Feb 11, 2026
Read full review →What we said about Supercharge
"The BritNed energy platform and VYRD insurance portal show real domain depth. The VYRD project includes qualitative user research with real homeowners—a clear signal of UX research capability when engaged. That said, case studies emphasize technology delivery over UX process—expect strong engineering-led execution rather than research-heavy design exploration."
— UXAgencies editorial team, reviewed Feb 2, 2026
Read full review →Best for
Where each agency measurably leads — on pricing, team capacity, declared specializations, and editorial scoring. Use these to match an agency to your project priorities.
Choose Method if you need
- •closer collaboration at a smaller team scale
- •disclosed specialization in FinTech
- •broader service offering — also covers Experience Design and UX/UI
Choose Supercharge if you need
- •a more cost-effective engagement (~38% lower rate)
- •larger team capacity for multi-stream or enterprise-scale programs
- •disclosed specialization in AI/ML
- •broader service offering — also covers Product Design and Software Engineering
Strengths and watch-outs
Both upsides and risks, straight from our editorial assessments.
Method
✓ Strengths
- •Published 'Modern Product Approach' framework on the website—ask for the specific process stages and deliverables mapped to your project type before scoping
- •Technology & Engineering is a standalone service line, not a partner referral—single-contract execution from strategy through production code reduces vendor coordination
⚠ Watch-outs
- •Enterprise-scale consultancy backed by GlobalLogic/Hitachi—if you need a small, agile UX team, this may be more organization than your project requires
- •Published case studies feature global brands but limited visible London-specific work—confirm which team and location will lead your engagement
Supercharge
✓ Strengths
- •5 detailed case studies across energy, insurance, healthcare, and mobility—showing genuine delivery breadth
- •VYRD project shows qualitative user research with real homeowners—a clear signal of UX research capability when engaged
- •Part of Siili Solutions (NASDAQ-listed), SOC2 and ISO27001 certified—strong signal for enterprise buyers requiring security and compliance
⚠ Watch-outs
- •UX design is one of 5 service pillars alongside engineering, data/AI, and managed services—expect strong engineering-led execution rather than research-heavy design exploration
- •Only 1 of 5 case studies (VYRD) shows explicit user research activity—ask for research-specific deliverable samples before committing to a research-heavy engagement
- •No case studies include measurable UX outcomes (conversion rates, task completion, usability scores)—results are framed as business metrics (app ratings, user counts)
Service coverage
Where each agency overlaps and where each is unique.
Only Method
- •Experience Design
- •UX/UI
- •Digital Transformation
Both
None.
Only Supercharge
- •Product Design
- •Software Engineering
- •Data & AI Engineering
Industry coverage
Where each agency overlaps and where each is unique.
Pricing math
Estimated cost of a typical 12-week senior engagement (~480 hours), at each agency's published rate.
Method
Rate: €117/hr
€56,160+
Supercharge
Rate: €70-100/hr
€33,600–€48,000
For most general product engagements, Supercharge delivers better ROI per hour. For FinTech-specific work, Method's premium is justified by their declared specialization.
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, Method or Supercharge?
- Supercharge is cheaper by roughly 38% — €85/hr median vs €117/hr at Method. The premium reflects either brand or specialization — see the editorial pull quotes for context.
- Which has more Healthcare experience, Method or Supercharge?
- Both agencies publish Healthcare case studies and have similar industry breadth. Compare directly on the agency profiles: Method and Supercharge.
- Which scores higher overall, Method or Supercharge?
- Both score equally well overall (77/100). The deciding factor is specialization — see the editorial quotes and Strengths sections above. Full methodology.
- When should I consider both Method and Supercharge?
- Consider running parallel discovery briefs with Method and Supercharge if your project spans multiple workstreams, you want competitive proposals to compare scope and approach, or you're undecided between the specialization angles each brings (see the Best for cards above). Most engagements ultimately go with one — but the parallel-brief phase is a low-cost way to validate fit.
Read the full reviews
Side-by-side comparison is a starting point. The full editorial reviews include portfolio analysis, case studies, and the buyer-strength / watch-out detail behind the bullets above.
Comparison last updated May 29, 2026. Most recently reviewed: Method on February 11, 2026. How we rank