Agency Comparison
Mito vs Supercharge
Two top-rated UX agencies in Budapest.
Side by side
Key data on both agencies. The accent dot marks where one leads.
| Mito | Supercharge | |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 66.5/100 | ●77/100 |
| Hourly rate | ●€40-79/hr | €70-100/hr |
| Team size | 50+ | ●100-249 |
| Location | Budapest, Hungary | Budapest, Hungary |
| Founded | 2008 | — |
| Tier | Free | Free |
| Last reviewed | ●Feb 11, 2026 | Feb 2, 2026 |
What we said about each
What we said about Mito
"Mito Group is a full-service marketing and digital group, but their Mito Digital unit publishes genuine UX work: the Auchan webshop redesign documents a conversion audit with card sorting and responsive redesign, the Libri bookstore project shows business goal framing through commerce-centered interface design, and the PLAY airlines booking engine demonstrates end-to-end product delivery. At least 4 digital product case studies show structured UX process. At €40–79/hr, best for organizations…"
— UXAgencies editorial team, reviewed Feb 11, 2026
Read full review →What we said about Supercharge
"The BritNed energy platform and VYRD insurance portal show real domain depth. The VYRD project includes qualitative user research with real homeowners—a clear signal of UX research capability when engaged. That said, case studies emphasize technology delivery over UX process—expect strong engineering-led execution rather than research-heavy design exploration."
— UXAgencies editorial team, reviewed Feb 2, 2026
Read full review →Best for
Where each agency measurably leads — on pricing, team capacity, declared specializations, and editorial scoring. Use these to match an agency to your project priorities.
Choose Mito if you need
- •a more cost-effective engagement (~30% lower rate)
- •closer collaboration at a smaller team scale
- •broader service offering — also covers UX/UI Design and Web Development
Choose Supercharge if you need
- •larger team capacity for multi-stream or enterprise-scale programs
- •disclosed specialization in Healthcare / AI/ML
- •broader service offering — also covers Product Design and Software Engineering
- •a higher overall editorial score
Strengths and watch-outs
Both upsides and risks, straight from our editorial assessments.
Mito
✓ Strengths
- •Auchan webshop case study shows full UX process—audit, card sorting, conversion-focused responsive redesign across devices
- •15+ year track record with major brands—Wizz Air, Auchan, Decathlon, Libri, Deutsche Telekom
- •Mito Digital unit delivers product work alongside creative, performance, and data divisions—useful when UX is part of a broader engagement
⚠ Watch-outs
- •UX/digital product is one of four business units—confirm you’ll be working with the Mito Digital team specifically, not the creative or performance divisions
- •Most of the group’s 6 pages of case studies are marketing campaigns and SEO—the digital product work is a subset of their total output
- •No published measurable UX outcomes (conversion lifts, task completion rates)—ask for specific results from the Auchan or Libri projects
Supercharge
✓ Strengths
- •5 detailed case studies across energy, insurance, healthcare, and mobility—showing genuine delivery breadth
- •VYRD project shows qualitative user research with real homeowners—a clear signal of UX research capability when engaged
- •Part of Siili Solutions (NASDAQ-listed), SOC2 and ISO27001 certified—strong signal for enterprise buyers requiring security and compliance
⚠ Watch-outs
- •UX design is one of 5 service pillars alongside engineering, data/AI, and managed services—expect strong engineering-led execution rather than research-heavy design exploration
- •Only 1 of 5 case studies (VYRD) shows explicit user research activity—ask for research-specific deliverable samples before committing to a research-heavy engagement
- •No case studies include measurable UX outcomes (conversion rates, task completion, usability scores)—results are framed as business metrics (app ratings, user counts)
Service coverage
Where each agency overlaps and where each is unique.
Only Mito
- •UX/UI Design
- •Web Development
- •Integrated Campaigns
Both
None.
Only Supercharge
- •Product Design
- •Software Engineering
- •Data & AI Engineering
Industry coverage
Where each agency overlaps and where each is unique.
Pricing math
Estimated cost of a typical 12-week senior engagement (~480 hours), at each agency's published rate.
Mito
Rate: €40-79/hr
€19,200–€37,920
Supercharge
Rate: €70-100/hr
€33,600–€48,000
For most general product engagements, Mito delivers better ROI per hour. For Healthcare-specific work, Supercharge's premium is justified by their declared specialization.
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, Mito or Supercharge?
- Mito is cheaper by roughly 30% — €60/hr median vs €85/hr at Supercharge. The premium reflects either brand or specialization — see the editorial pull quotes for context.
- Which scores higher overall, Mito or Supercharge?
- Supercharge scores 77/100, 10.5 points higher than Mito at 66.5/100. See our methodology for how scores are calculated.
- When should I consider both Mito and Supercharge?
- Consider running parallel discovery briefs with Mito and Supercharge if your project spans multiple workstreams, you want competitive proposals to compare scope and approach, or you're undecided between the specialization angles each brings (see the Best for cards above). Most engagements ultimately go with one — but the parallel-brief phase is a low-cost way to validate fit.
Read the full reviews
Side-by-side comparison is a starting point. The full editorial reviews include portfolio analysis, case studies, and the buyer-strength / watch-out detail behind the bullets above.
Comparison last updated May 29, 2026. Most recently reviewed: Mito on February 11, 2026. How we rank