HomeCompareEtnetera Flow vs Spring/Summer

Agency Comparison

Etnetera Flow vs Spring/Summer

Comparing Product Design options: Prague vs Copenhagen.

Etnetera Flow

Etnetera Flow

Prague, Czech Republic

Score: 73/100

Spring/Summer

Spring/Summer

Copenhagen, Denmark

Score: 75/100

Side by side

Key data on both agencies. The accent dot marks where one leads.

Etnetera FlowSpring/Summer
Editorial score73/10075/100
Hourly rate€50/hr€150-199/hr
Team size50-9910-49
LocationPrague, Czech RepublicCopenhagen, Denmark
Founded2013
TierFreeFree
Last reviewedFeb 11, 2026May 30, 2026

What we said about each

What we said about Etnetera Flow

"15+ published case studies anchored by enterprise mobile work for major automotive and banking brands. The MyŠkoda project documents a full app rewrite involving 8 Scrum teams and 100 people, with the result handed over to a joint venture—a strong signal of delivery at scale. User research appears as a dedicated service line across multiple projects, not just a checkbox."

— UXAgencies editorial team, reviewed Feb 11, 2026

Read full review →

What we said about Spring/Summer

"The published portfolio runs 65 projects across e-commerce, brand identity, and website builds, with named clients including Polène, American Express, Carl Hansen & Søn, Bang & Olufsen, and Carlsberg, plus mobile work for Magasin, Uniqlo, and Swatch; the award record is documented in depth (Awwwards 2x Site of the Year and 23x Site of the Day, FWA 28x). Case studies read as design-rationale narratives heavy on visuals and strategic framing rather than UX evidence, with no user research…"

— UXAgencies editorial team, reviewed May 30, 2026

Read full review →

Best for

Where each agency measurably leads — on pricing, team capacity, declared specializations, and editorial scoring. Use these to match an agency to your project priorities.

Choose Etnetera Flow if you need

  • a more cost-effective engagement (~71% lower rate)
  • larger team capacity for multi-stream or enterprise-scale programs
  • disclosed specialization in Automotive
  • broader service offering — also covers Mobile App Development and User Research

Choose Spring/Summer if you need

  • closer collaboration at a smaller team scale
  • disclosed specialization in SaaS & B2B
  • broader service offering — also covers Design Systems and Service Design
  • a higher overall editorial score

Strengths and watch-outs

Both upsides and risks, straight from our editorial assessments.

Etnetera Flow

✓ Strengths

  • Enterprise-scale delivery track record—MyŠkoda app serves hundreds of thousands of daily users, built with up to 8 Scrum teams
  • Dedicated User Research service line with visible research work across automotive, pharma, and telecom clients
  • Part of Etnetera Group—access to backend development, data analytics, AI, and cloud services under one umbrella

⚠ Watch-outs

  • Published case studies are primarily Czech and Central European brands—clarify international project experience if your users are outside this market
  • Listed hourly rate of €50 appears low for the enterprise scale of work shown—request a detailed estimate early to understand actual project pricing

Spring/Summer

✓ Strengths

  • 65 published projects with recognizable clients (Polène, American Express, Carl Hansen & Søn, Bang & Olufsen, Carlsberg) and full case-study pages for each, concentrated in e-commerce and brand/website work.
  • Documented award record across multiple bodies (Awwwards 2x Site of the Year / 23x Site of the Day, FWA 28x, Creative Circle Digital Agency of the Year), supporting the premium positioning on craft.
  • Clear business legitimacy: Copenhagen address, phone, email, a stated 15-20 person multidisciplinary team, and named platform competencies (Shopify Plus, Sanity, Webflow).

⚠ Watch-outs

  • Ask for research artefacts and quantified outcomes (conversion lift, AOV, traffic) before signing; the visible case studies show design rationale and aesthetics but no testing or redesign-attributable metrics, which is a gap at a €150-199/hr rate.
  • Confirm Service Design, UX Audit, and Dashboard Design capability directly, as none appear in the site's offerings or portfolio.
  • Verify FinTech and SaaS/B2B experience with reference projects, since the visible finance work is investment/portfolio sites rather than fintech products.

Service coverage

Where each agency overlaps and where each is unique.

Only Etnetera Flow

Industry coverage

Where each agency overlaps and where each is unique.

Only Etnetera Flow

Only Spring/Summer

Pricing math

Estimated cost of a typical 12-week senior engagement (~480 hours), at each agency's published rate.

Etnetera Flow

Rate: €50/hr

€24,000–€24,000

Spring/Summer

Rate: €150-199/hr

€72,000–€95,520

For most general product engagements, Etnetera Flow delivers better ROI per hour. For SaaS & B2B-specific work, Spring/Summer's premium is justified by their declared specialization.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Etnetera Flow or Spring/Summer?
Etnetera Flow is cheaper by roughly 71% — €50/hr median vs €175/hr at Spring/Summer. The premium reflects either brand or specialization — see the editorial pull quotes for context.
Which has more FinTech experience, Etnetera Flow or Spring/Summer?
Both agencies publish FinTech case studies and have similar industry breadth. Compare directly on the agency profiles: Etnetera Flow and Spring/Summer.
Which scores higher overall, Etnetera Flow or Spring/Summer?
Spring/Summer scores 75/100, 2 points higher than Etnetera Flow at 73/100. See our methodology for how scores are calculated.
Which is faster to engage, Etnetera Flow or Spring/Summer?
Spring/Summer is typically faster to engage — smaller team, fewer procurement gates. Etnetera Flow operates with longer lead times (typical 4–6 week onboarding), reflecting larger-scale program work. Confirm engagement timelines directly with each before signing.
When should I consider both Etnetera Flow and Spring/Summer?
Consider running parallel discovery briefs with Etnetera Flow and Spring/Summer if your project spans multiple workstreams, you want competitive proposals to compare scope and approach, or you're undecided between the specialization angles each brings (see the Best for cards above). Most engagements ultimately go with one — but the parallel-brief phase is a low-cost way to validate fit.

Read the full reviews

Side-by-side comparison is a starting point. The full editorial reviews include portfolio analysis, case studies, and the buyer-strength / watch-out detail behind the bullets above.

Comparison last updated May 30, 2026. Most recently reviewed: Spring/Summer on May 30, 2026. How we rank

UXAgencies

© 2026 UXAgencies.com — All rights reserved