Agency Comparison
Cyber-Duck vs Other Land
Comparing Accessibility options: London vs Lisbon.
Side by side
Key data on both agencies. The accent dot marks where one leads.
| Cyber-Duck | Other Land | |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | ●77/100 | 66/100 |
| Hourly rate | €75-125/hr | ●€60-80/hr |
| Team size | ●50-99 | 3 |
| Location | London, United Kingdom | Lisbon, Portugal |
| Founded | — | 2024 |
| Tier | Free | Free |
| Last reviewed | Feb 11, 2026 | ●May 30, 2026 |
What we said about each
What we said about Cyber-Duck
"Cyber-Duck (now CACI Digital Experience) publishes detailed case studies for major UK institutions—the Bank of England project documents persona development, content strategy for 4,500+ pages, user testing, and measurable outcomes (308% social traffic increase, 30% longer session times). ISO-certified across human-centred design (9241), quality (9001), and security (27001), with 170+ awards over 20 years. Best for government, healthcare, and finance organizations requiring ISO-accredited UX…"
— UXAgencies editorial team, reviewed Feb 11, 2026
Read full review →What we said about Other Land
"The single-page site publishes four before/after case studies (Sides, DRESSX, Risk Index, Telekom) led by headline numbers like a $10M Series A, 30K monthly users across 25+ countries, and 12. 3M app users on a Telekom design system, each tagged with a collaboration length of four months to 1. 5 years."
— UXAgencies editorial team, reviewed May 30, 2026
Read full review →Best for
Where each agency measurably leads — on pricing, team capacity, declared specializations, and editorial scoring. Use these to match an agency to your project priorities.
Choose Cyber-Duck if you need
- •larger team capacity for multi-stream or enterprise-scale programs
- •disclosed specialization in Government / Education
- •broader service offering — also covers UX/UI Design and Digital Strategy
- •a higher overall editorial score
Choose Other Land if you need
- •a more cost-effective engagement (~43% lower rate)
- •closer collaboration at a smaller team scale
- •disclosed specialization in SaaS & B2B / AI/ML
- •broader service offering — also covers Product Design and Design Systems
Strengths and watch-outs
Both upsides and risks, straight from our editorial assessments.
Cyber-Duck
✓ Strengths
- •National Highways project passed GDS Alpha assessment on first attempt—directly relevant if your project must meet Government Digital Service standards
- •Private sector clients visible alongside public sector: Handelsbanken, Worcester Bosch, Cadbury—the ISO-accredited process applies to commercial engagements, not just government
- •Deloitte Technology Fast 500 recognition signals sustained business growth and operational maturity beyond design delivery
⚠ Watch-outs
- •Now part of CACI Digital Experience—confirm team continuity and whether original Cyber-Duck principals lead your engagement
- •ISO-certified process and public sector compliance overhead may mean longer timelines—clarify turnaround expectations upfront
Other Land
✓ Strengths
- •Four case studies each pair a client with concrete numbers and a stated engagement length: Sides ($10M Series A, 1.5 years), DRESSX ($15M Series A, 4.6/5 rating, 1 year), Risk Index (30K monthly users, 4 months), and Telekom (12.3M app users, design system, 1.5 years).
- •Independent validation on Clutch: 5.0/5 across 10 reviews, operating since 2017, with reviewers citing faster user journeys, fewer drop-offs, and more completed bookings.
- •The embedded model is described as a 5-step flow (intro call, senior designer assigned, integration via Slack, weekly iteration, delivery), and one testimonial documents a 2+ year placement of two designers at Stockpile.
⚠ Watch-outs
- •The site shows metrics and before/after images but no written research or testing detail, so ask for one full case study walkthrough covering the problem, the research method, the iterations, and how each headline number was measured.
- •Of the clients named in this listing, only Stockpile appears on the live site and only in a testimonial; ask the team to confirm scope and recency for Apollo, Italic, and Cricut before relying on those names.
- •Public data points to a US/Kyiv operation and a team larger than three, so confirm where your designer sits, their time zone, and the contracting entity before signing.
Service coverage
Where each agency overlaps and where each is unique.
Only Cyber-Duck
- •UX/UI Design
- •Digital Strategy
Both
Only Other Land
Industry coverage
Where each agency overlaps and where each is unique.
Pricing math
Estimated cost of a typical 12-week senior engagement (~480 hours), at each agency's published rate.
Cyber-Duck
Rate: €75-125/hr
€36,000–€60,000
Other Land
Rate: €60-80/hr
€28,800–€38,400
For most general product engagements, Other Land delivers better ROI per hour. For Government-specific work, Cyber-Duck's premium is justified by their declared specialization.
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, Cyber-Duck or Other Land?
- Other Land is cheaper by roughly 43% — €70/hr median vs €100/hr at Cyber-Duck. The premium reflects either brand or specialization — see the editorial pull quotes for context.
- Which has more Healthcare experience, Cyber-Duck or Other Land?
- Both agencies publish Healthcare case studies. Other Land has the broader industry stack overall, with disclosed experience in SaaS & B2B, AI/ML, EdTech beyond their shared focus.
- Which scores higher overall, Cyber-Duck or Other Land?
- Cyber-Duck scores 77/100, 11 points higher than Other Land at 66/100. Both portfolio quality and business credibility feed into the score — see our methodology for the full breakdown.
- Which is faster to engage, Cyber-Duck or Other Land?
- Other Land is typically faster to engage — smaller team, fewer procurement gates. Cyber-Duck operates with longer lead times (typical 4–6 week onboarding), reflecting larger-scale program work. Confirm engagement timelines directly with each before signing.
- When should I consider both Cyber-Duck and Other Land?
- Consider running parallel discovery briefs with Cyber-Duck and Other Land if your project spans multiple workstreams, you want competitive proposals to compare scope and approach, or you're undecided between the specialization angles each brings (see the Best for cards above). Most engagements ultimately go with one — but the parallel-brief phase is a low-cost way to validate fit.
Read the full reviews
Side-by-side comparison is a starting point. The full editorial reviews include portfolio analysis, case studies, and the buyer-strength / watch-out detail behind the bullets above.
Comparison last updated May 30, 2026. Most recently reviewed: Other Land on May 30, 2026. How we rank